Blog

Spiritual art doesn't have meaning. It has mood which when caught invites you to encounter the presence through its portal. The ensuing dialogue between the two of you, one on this side of time and the other no longer bound by it, will do what is needed.

Curators kill the art by reducing it to explanations, biography, narratives and movements. They are the butchers of the art world killing the art so that they can dissect it for the museum's cafeteria.

Spiritual art is an ambiguous term that can mean anything from art based on an established religion, abstract works that rely on a theory of 'natural' spirituality, to Romantic figurative works from 'super-hero' aesthetics. As in the case of all art, what a piece of art portrays is the personality of the artist and his/her spiritual depth. Spirituality begins with a personal encounter with the reality of one's own death. If there is no visceral encounter with death then the artist is only illustrating some religious or secular ideology about the spiritual. The spiritual is the non-material existence that exists after death but seems to be the force that invades our mortal life. Of course there is no proof that a spiritual world exists other than what we perceive to be spiritual. I have found that some artists have been able to take the  images of their religion's mythology and encounter the frontier of death/life but most artists that use their religious mythology only produce propaganda and kitsch. The abstracted art that is said to be spiritual are based on the spirituality that arose out of the late 19th and early 20 centuries and owe as debt to R. Steiner and H. Blavatsky. Many of the art works that say they come out of this type of non-sectarian 'natural' spirituality are little more than wall paper because the artist has not viscerally encountered death through his/her art. Again what is expressed is the artist's soul/personality. Spiritual art should take a 'prepared audience' to the encounter with death. In this case there will be either of two experiences. The artist and the audience will either experience a feeling of mystery and presence or a feeling of non-presence and the eternal void.

My art is situated in the space between the dimensions. 

I believe that the role of theology in the 21st century should be to free people from religion.

Every epoch uses art to clothe the gods that it fashions.

From the dawn of mankind to the present, the belief that human life does not end at death but transitions into a new existernce has been persistent. The nature of what the after-life is varies from epoch to epoch, culture to culture, and religion to religion. Cultures, including those of our times, are built and regulated based on these after-life mystholgies. When one searches through the diversity of after-life mythologies from ancient times to the present, there are some consistent elements that appear. The idea that life is a 'journey' in which humans undergo a series of 'passages' is one of these elements. There is also an almost universal reference to the experience of a 'light' unlike anything experienced in this world. The discription of this radiance shows a consistency from the earliest mystics to modern day NDE survivors. I also find it referenced in artists such as, Rothko, Rembrandt, Friedrich, Rouault, Klee,Redon,etc. At one point in my journey I became aware that the objects in my paintings were not what the paintings were about, but it was the 'light' seen as a luminesence in the colors. This light is in some sense, the presence of a being that pushes through the two dimensional surface of the paintings seeking encounters-the paintings are channels. I don't attach religious significance to the light but rather that it is somehow relevant to an after-death existence that we do not yet have the physics for. 

Feb.8,2012 entry