Here's the sequence for Li and K'an

(K'an is still in process - the paint is now so thick I am not sure it will ever dry!)

Li - base
Li - first choice
Li - second choice (initial layer)
Li - flow complete
K'an - base
K'an - first choice
K'an - second choice
K'an - flow complete
Here's a couple more base colors - I really like these!

Where are you?

Ken - base
Sun - base
Here's the base geometry:

Geometry
The painting surface is divided into eight equal segments and four evenly spaced concentric circles.

The concentric circles are further divided to reflect a cumulative sequence of choices:

Inner Circle = No Choice = Unity = Undivided

Second Circle = First Choice = Semicircles = Halved

Third Circle = Second Choice = Quadrants = Thirds

Fourth Circle = Third Chice = Octants = Quartered

n.b. the number of segments represents the number of possibilities arising from successive binary choices.

The number of rings represents the number of choices made (which is also the number of trigrams).

Colors are keyed to the eight possible trigrams i.e. the possible combinations of broken and unbroken lines (or, in modern parlance, circuits).

Movement from one color/trigram to the next is by adding a new upper line and discarding the lowest line. This is why there are only four movement patterns - the bottom line of the trigram is not counted so in fact you are only looking at the logical possibilities of two lines:

On On

On Off

Off On

Off Off

Bugger - here's the next dilemma:

Tui looks better rotated - but when I did this digitally I accidentaly cropped the square to an octagon.

Of course these should be octagons - but shouldn't the rotation be colors at edges rather than corners?

Tui Rotated Square
Tui Rotated Octagon
Here's how he other two look:

K'un rotated - octagon
Ch'ien rotated - octagon
And here's a first go at Chen painted as an octagon:

Chen
Which do you prefer?

K'un & Ch'ien - similar
K'un & Ch'ien - mirror
above) Two paintings with the same form
below) Two paintings as mirror images
(option c is for you to make up!)

(. . . I am starting to think that the same form shows the differences more clearly - but the mirror is philosopically appealing . . . )

all comments appreciated: p@pguestprojects.com

 


Be the first to post a comment.



Previously published:

Here are some of the ideas that I have been exploring.

Please let me know if there's anything you want to correct/find interesting/would like a copy of - or to purchase/participate in etc.

 Philip James GuestLos Angeles, CA310.383.2327

RSS |